Dimensional's global corporate governance activities are managed by the Corporate Governance (CG) group, which sits within Dimensional's Portfolio Management department. The group implements policies, monitors day-to-day operations, and researches governance issues and industry trends. Our Corporate Governance Committee, comprised of senior management, is responsible for overseeing the CG group, formulating and recommending changes to policy, and making decisions on governance-related matters.

Dimensional votes proxies on behalf of equity mutual funds, as well as those separate account mandates for which clients have given us the authority to vote. Our voting activities are intended to maximize shareholder value. This involves consideration of the feasibility, costs, and expected benefits of voting for each portfolio. Our Proxy Voting Policies, set forth in our Statement of Additional Information (SAI), further describe how we vote; answers to some specific questions are provided below.

Dimensional seeks to vote, or refrain from voting, proxies in a manner that we believe is in the best interest of each portfolio. In instances where the costs—including opportunity costs—of voting exceed the expected economic benefits, we may refrain from voting. Additionally, international market restrictions—such as share blocking, re-registration, and onerous power of attorney requirements—may preclude us from voting in certain markets or at certain company meetings.

Summary statistics on our voting for the US-domiciled mutual funds during the 2012 calendar year may be found here.

Yes. Dimensional has engaged Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a subsidiary of MSCI Inc., to provide information on shareholder meeting dates, research on proxy proposals, and voting recommendations based on our Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Guidelines. ISS also provides vote execution through its proprietary voting platform. In addition to ISS, we may also review voting recommendations from Glass Lewis and other research providers for selected meetings. Third-party research is only one of several inputs into our voting decision on a given proposal. We retain final discretion on how to vote.

Dimensional generally does not disclose our voting intentions or share ownership prior to voting, except as required by applicable laws and regulation.

Yes. Annually, we file form N-PX, containing the full voting record for our US-based mutual funds, with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. We also disclose voting for our Canada-based mutual funds as well as summary voting information for our UK OEICs, Irish UCITs and Australian trusts on the respective regional websites.

We may discuss specific governance issues or concerns with the management of companies held in the portfolios we manage.

Yes. Dimensional became a signatory to the UN-PRI in August 2012.

The group may be contacted via email: corporategovernance@dimensional.com.

Yes. Dimensional discloses brokerage commissions paid by each Portfolio or Master Fund for the three most recent fiscal years ended November 30. The information appears in the Statement of Additional Information for each Portfolio. These commissions are compensation for transactions in portfolio securities and are not sales commissions.

CRSP ("crisp") is an acronym for the Center for Research in Security Prices at the University of Chicago. Established in 1960 with a grant from Merrill Lynch & Co., the center undertook a massive data-gathering project to answer the question "how have stocks performed over the long term?" Under the direction of James Lorie, Ph.D., a professor of business administration, and Lawrence Fisher, associate professor of finance, a database of both price and dividend information was compiled for all common stocks listed on the NYSE beginning in 1926. Over two million bits of information were entered onto magnetic tape, and the commercial computers then becoming available calculated total returns. The results were published in a landmark article in the Journal of Business in January 1964. The center continues to add data on a regular basis, and with a substantial grant from Dimensional Fund Advisors in 1984, added data from NASDAQ markets starting in January 1972. The CRSP data files have been an essential tool in the study of capital markets by an entire generation of financial economists.

Detailed research into the sources of investment returns (Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. "Industry Costs of Equity." Journal of Financial Economics 43 (1997), 153-93.) concludes that industries, or companies' products, are not a factor in expected stock returns. Industry effects can influence prices, but in a seemingly random, short-term way that can be mitigated in a diversified strategy. Therefore, industry effects, though they pose risks that are worth taking into account, are not a primary variable on which to sort securities for investment purposes.

Firms developing new technologies have no assurance of earning above-average long-run profits. The competitive forces in a free market work constantly to disperse the benefits of innovation throughout the economy. The retailer using new high-speed computers to cut inventory costs, for example, may reap greater economic rewards than the company who developed them. And if competition pressures the retailer to pass the resulting savings along in the form of lower prices, the ultimate beneficiary is the consumer. Even if one could correctly predict technological trends, identifying the winners from an investment standpoint becomes an elusive exercise.

Consider the birth of the personal computer industry in the early 1980s and its subsequent explosive growth. Industry pioneers IBM and Apple Computer were responsible for many innovations, yet shares of both firms have lagged the broad stock market: total return for the 20-year period ending December 2001 was 333% for Apple Computer, 1360% for IBM, and 1606% for the S&P 500 index (Center for Research in Security Prices, University of Chicago; Ibbotson Associates).

Buying stocks for the funds is a detailed process but can be described in general terms. We create an eligible universe of all traded stocks of real operating companies. We then apply filters to exclude stocks that do not fit the asset class of the fund or that have specific pricing or trading concerns. The remaining stocks are eligible for purchase and are subject to rough market-capitalization target weights. We regularly monitor trading in the market place with real-time checks for current news that may impact prices, such as a looming takeover. Other than that, we're generally indifferent among the stocks in the eligible universe, which allows us to trade opportunistically and take advantage of liquidity premiums that benefit client returns. For additional information regarding the investment strategies of each fund, please read each fund's prospectus and statement of additional information carefully.

The Efficient Market Hypothesis says that market prices are fair: they fully reflect all available information. This does not mean that prices are perfect; some prices may be too high and some too low, but there is no reliable way to tell. In an efficient market, investors cannot expect to earn above-average profits without assuming above-average risks. Market efficiency does not suggest that investors can't "win." Over any period of time, some investors will beat the market, but the number of investors who do so will be no greater than expected by chance.

Dimensional believes that five factors explain the vast majority of returns in diversified portfolios (market, size, and value for equities; term risk and default risk for fixed income). They also appear to explain the behavior of hybrid asset classes such as high yield bonds or convertible securities. In general, Dimensional believes the behavior of these asset classes can be captured more reliably and at lower cost by using some combination of structured equity strategies combined with high-grade short-term fixed income securities.

Dimensional's fixed income approach is "passive" in one sense—it involves no interest rate or economic forecasting—but is "active" in implementation. Research conducted by Eugene Fama at the University of Chicago suggests a shifting-maturity strategy that targets segments of the yield curve with the highest expected return can add value relative to a conventional indexed approach. The optimal maturity targets are constantly reviewed using information provided in the yield curve, and transactions are made if the increase in expected return exceeds the cost of making the trade. Annual portfolio turnover in excess of 100% is not unusual. An important element of the shifting maturity strategy is a focus exclusively on short-term instruments with the highest credit quality. These issues are very liquid, and can be traded at very low cost.

For investors who define risk solely as the variability of returns, such a strategy might be appropriate. Whether such investors actually exist is debatable. Most investors are probably sensitive to the risk of being different from the market, even if overall variability is no higher. Value stocks do not outperform market portfolios regularly or predictably—if they did, they would not be riskier. To the extent an investor is likely to be disappointed with performance that differs from a market portfolio, a tilt toward value stocks should be undertaken cautiously!

A shareholder must own shares on the record date in order to be entitled to distributions. The following business day is the ex-dividend date, when distributions or capital gains are deducted from the fund's assets or set aside to be paid to the shareholder. On this day, the fund's net asset value decreases by the amount of distribution to be paid out, plus or minus any market activity. The distributions are actually scheduled to be paid on the payable date.